The Velocity Field Olympics: Assessing velocity field reconstructions with direct distance tracers

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) (2025) staf1960

Authors:

Richard Stiskalek, Harry Desmond, Julien Devriendt, Adrianne Slyz, Guilhem Lavaux, Michael J Hudson, Deaglan J Bartlett, Hélène M Courtois

Abstract:

Abstract The peculiar velocity field of the local Universe provides direct insights into its matter distribution and the underlying theory of gravity, and is essential in cosmological analyses for modelling deviations from the Hubble flow. Numerous methods have been developed to reconstruct the density and velocity fields at z ≲ 0.05, typically constrained by redshift-space galaxy positions or by direct distance tracers such as the Tully–Fisher relation, the fundamental plane, or Type Ia supernovae. We introduce a validation framework to evaluate the accuracy of these reconstructions against catalogues of direct distance tracers. Our framework assesses the goodness-of-fit of each reconstruction using Bayesian evidence, residual redshift discrepancies, velocity scaling, and the need for external bulk flows. Applying this framework to a suite of reconstructions—including those derived from the Bayesian Origin Reconstruction from Galaxies (BORG) algorithm and from linear theory—we find that the non-linear BORG reconstruction consistently outperforms others. We highlight the utility of such a comparative approach for supernova or gravitational wave cosmological studies, where selecting an optimal peculiar velocity model is essential. Additionally, we present calibrated bulk flow curves predicted by the reconstructions and perform a density–velocity cross-correlation using a linear theory reconstruction to constrain the growth factor, yielding S8 = 0.793 ± 0.035. The result is in good agreement with both weak lensing and Planck, but is in strong disagreement with some peculiar velocity studies.

A 1-per cent-accurate method to include baryonic effects in galaxy–galaxy lensing models

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press 544:4 (2025) 3512-3532

Authors:

Matteo Zennaro, Giovanni Aricò, Carlos García-García, Raúl E Angulo, Lurdes Ondaro-Mallea, Sergio Contreras, Andrina Nicola, Matthieu Schaller, Joop Schaye

Abstract:

The clustering of galaxies and galaxy–galaxy lensing are two of the main observational probes in Stage-IV large-scale structure surveys, such as Euclid and LSST. Unfortunately, the complicated relationship between galaxies and matter greatly limits the exploitation of this data. Sophisticated theoretical galaxy bias models–such as the hybrid Lagrangian bias expansion – allow describing galaxy clustering down to scales as small as . However, the galaxy–matter cross-power spectra are already affected by baryons on these scales, directly impacting the modelling of galaxy–galaxy lensing. In this work, we propose a way to extend state-of-the-art models of the galaxy–matter cross-power spectrum (currently only accounting for dark matter) by including a baryonic correction term inferred from the matter component [the suppression ], so that . We use the FLAMINGO hydrodynamical simulations to measure the effect of baryons on the galaxy–matter cross-power spectrum and to assess the performance of our model. Specifically, we perform a Bayesian analysis of synthetic data, implementing a model based on BACCO’s hybrid Lagrangian bias expansion (for the non-linear galaxy bias) and Baryon Correction Model (for the baryon suppression of the matter power spectrum). Ignoring the effect of baryons on the galaxy–matter cross-power spectrum leads to a biased inference of the galaxy bias parameters, while ignoring baryons in both the galaxy–matter and matter–matter power spectra leads to a biased inference of both the galaxy bias and cosmological parameters. In contrast, our method is 1 per cent accurate compared to all physics variations in FLAMINGO and on all scales described by hybrid perturbative models (). Moreover, our model leads to inferred bias and cosmological parameters compatible within 1 with their reference values. We anticipate that our method will be a promising candidate for analysing forthcoming Stage-IV survey data.

Creating halos with autoregressive multistage networks

Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS) 112:10 (2025) 103503

Authors:

Shivam Pandey, Chirag Modi, Benjamin D Wandelt, Deaglan J Bartlett, Adrian E Bayer, Greg L Bryan, Matthew Ho, Guilhem Lavaux, T Lucas Makinen, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics IOP Publishing 2025:11 (2025) 063

Authors:

Erminia Calabrese, J Colin Hill, Hidde T Jense, Adrien La Posta, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Graeme E Addison, Peter AR Ade, Simone Aiola, Tommy Alford, David Alonso, Mandana Amiri, Rui An, Zachary Atkins, Jason E Austermann, Eleonora Barbavara, Nicola Barbieri, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, James A Beall, Rachel Bean, Ali Beheshti, Benjamin Beringue, Tanay Bhandarkar, Emily Biermann, Boris Bolliet, J Richard Bond, Valentina Capalbo, Felipe Carrero, Shi-Fan Chen, Grace Chesmore, Hsiao-mei Cho, Steve K Choi, Susan E Clark, Nicholas F Cothard, Kevin Coughlin, William Coulton, Devin Crichton, Kevin T Crowley, Omar Darwish, Mark J Devlin, Simon Dicker, Cody J Duell, Shannon M Duff, Adriaan J Duivenvoorden, Jo Dunkley, Rolando Dunner, Carmen Embil Villagra, Max Fankhanel, Gerrit S Farren, Simone Ferraro, Allen Foster, Rodrigo Freundt, Brittany Fuzia, Patricio A Gallardo, Xavier Garrido, Martina Gerbino, Serena Giardiello, Ajay Gill, Jahmour Givans, Vera Gluscevic, Samuel Goldstein, Joseph E Golec, Yulin Gong, Yilun Guan, Mark Halpern, Ian Harrison, Matthew Hasselfield, Adam He, Erin Healy, Shawn Henderson, Brandon Hensley, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo, Gene C Hilton, Matt Hilton, Adam D Hincks, Renée Hložek, Shuay-Pwu Patty Ho, John Hood, Erika Hornecker, Zachary B Huber, Johannes Hubmayr, Kevin M Huffenberger, John P Hughes, Margaret Ikape, Kent Irwin, Giovanni Isopi, Neha Joshi, Ben Keller, Joshua Kim, Kenda Knowles, Brian J Koopman, Arthur Kosowsky, Darby Kramer, Aleksandra Kusiak, Alex Laguë, Victoria Lakey, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Eunseong Lee, Yaqiong Li, Zack Li, Michele Limon, Martine Lokken, Thibaut Louis, Marius Lungu, Niall MacCrann, Amanda MacInnis, Mathew S Madhavacheril, Diego Maldonado, Felipe Maldonado, Maya Mallaby-Kay, Gabriela A Marques, Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Fiona McCarthy, Jeff McMahon, Yogesh Mehta, Felipe Menanteau, Kavilan Moodley, Thomas W Morris, Tony Mroczkowski, Sigurd Naess, Toshiya Namikawa, Federico Nati, Simran K Nerval, Laura Newburgh, Andrina Nicola, Michael D Niemack, Michael R Nolta, John Orlowski-Scherer, Luca Pagano, Lyman A Page, Shivam Pandey, Bruce Partridge, Karen Perez Sarmiento, Heather Prince, Roberto Puddu, Frank J Qu, Damien C Ragavan, Bernardita Ried Guachalla, Keir K Rogers, Felipe Rojas, Tai Sakuma, Emmanuel Schaan, Benjamin L Schmitt, Neelima Sehgal, Shabbir Shaikh, Blake D Sherwin, Carlos Sierra, Jon Sievers, Cristóbal Sifón, Sara Simon, Rita Sonka, David N Spergel, Suzanne T Staggs, Emilie Storer, Kristen Surrao, Eric R Switzer, Niklas Tampier, Leander Thiele, Robert Thornton, Hy Trac, Carole Tucker, Joel Ullom, Leila R Vale, Alexander Van Engelen, Jeff Van Lanen, Cristian Vargas, Eve M Vavagiakis, Kasey Wagoner, Yuhan Wang, Lukas Wenzl, Edward J Wollack, Kaiwen Zheng, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope collaboration

Abstract:

We use new cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary temperature and polarization anisotropy measurements from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) Data Release 6 (DR6) to test foundational assumptions of the standard cosmological model, ΛCDM, and set constraints on extensions to it. We derive constraints from the ACT DR6 power spectra alone, as well as in combination with legacy data from the Planck mission. To break geometric degeneracies, we include ACT and Planck CMB lensing data and baryon acoustic oscillation data from DESI Year-1. To test the dependence of our results on non-ACT data, we also explore combinations replacing Planck with WMAP and DESI with BOSS, and further add supernovae measurements from Pantheon+ for models that affect the late-time expansion history. We verify the near-scale-invariance (running of the spectral index dns /d ln k = 0.0062 ± 0.0052) and adiabaticity of the primordial perturbations. Neutrino properties are consistent with Standard Model predictions: we find no evidence for new light, relativistic species that are free-streaming (N eff = 2.86 ± 0.13, which combined with astrophysical measurements of primordial helium and deuterium abundances becomes N eff = 2.89 ± 0.11), for non-zero neutrino masses (∑mν < 0.089 eV at 95% CL), or for neutrino self-interactions. We also find no evidence for self-interacting dark radiation (N idr < 0.134), or for early-universe variation of fundamental constants, including the fine-structure constant (α EM/α EM,0 = 1.0043 ± 0.0017) and the electron mass (me /me,0 = 1.0063 ± 0.0056). Our data are consistent with standard big bang nucleosynthesis (we find Yp = 0.2312 ± 0.0092), the COBE/FIRAS-inferred CMB temperature (we find T CMB = 2.698 ± 0.016 K), a dark matter component that is collisionless and with only a small fraction allowed as axion-like particles, a cosmological constant (w = -0.986 ± 0.025), and the late-time growth rate predicted by general relativity (γ = 0.663 ± 0.052). We find no statistically significant preference for a departure from the baseline ΛCDM model. In fits to models invoking early dark energy, primordial magnetic fields, or an arbitrary modified recombination history, we find H 0 = 69.9+0.8 -1.5, 69.1 ± 0.5, or 69.6 ± 1.0 km/s/Mpc, respectively; using BOSS instead of DESI BAO data reduces the central values of these constraints by 1–1.5 km/s/Mpc while only slightly increasing the error bars. In general, models introduced to increase the Hubble constant or to decrease the amplitude of density fluctuations inferred from the primary CMB are not favored over ΛCDM by our data.

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 maps

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics IOP Publishing 2025:11 (2025) 061

Authors:

Sigurd Naess, Yilun Guan, Adriaan J Duivenvoorden, Matthew Hasselfield, Yuhan Wang, Irene Abril-Cabezas, Graeme E Addison, Peter AR Ade, Simone Aiola, Tommy Alford, David Alonso, Mandana Amiri, Rui An, Zachary Atkins, Jason E Austermann, Eleonora Barbavara, Nicholas Battaglia, Elia Stefano Battistelli, James A Beall, Rachel Bean, Ali Beheshti, Benjamin Beringue, Tanay Bhandarkar, Emily Biermann, Boris Bolliet, J Richard Bond, Erminia Calabrese, Valentina Capalbo, Felipe Carrero, Stephen Chen, Grace Chesmore, Hsiao-mei Cho, Steve K Choi, Susan E Clark, Rodrigo Cordova Rosado, Nicholas F Cothard, Kevin Coughlin, William Coulton, Devin Crichton, Kevin T Crowley, Mark J Devlin, Simon Dicker, Cody J Duell, Shannon M Duff, Jo Dunkley, Rolando Dunner, Carmen Embil Villagra, Max Fankhanel, Gerrit S Farren, Simone Ferraro, Allen Foster, Rodrigo Freundt, Brittany Fuzia, Patricio A Gallardo, Xavier Garrido, Serena Giardiello, Ajay Gill, Jahmour Givans, Vera Gluscevic, Joseph E Golec, Yulin Gong, Mark Halpern, Ian Harrison, Erin Healy, Shawn Henderson, Brandon Hensley, Carlos Hervías-Caimapo, J Colin Hill, Gene C Hilton, Matt Hilton, Adam D Hincks, Renée Hložek, Shuay-Pwu Patty Ho, John Hood, Erika Hornecker, Zachary B Huber, Johannes Hubmayr, Kevin M Huffenberger, John P Hughes, Margaret Ikape, Kent Irwin, Giovanni Isopi, Hidde T Jense, Neha Joshi, Ben Keller, Joshua Kim, Kenda Knowles, Brian J Koopman, Arthur Kosowsky, Darby Kramer, Aleksandra Kusiak, Adrien La Posta, Alex Laguë, Victoria Lakey, Eunseong Lee, Yaqiong Li, Zack Li, Michele Limon, Martine Lokken, Thibaut Louis, Marius Lungu, Niall MacCrann, Amanda MacInnis, Mathew S Madhavacheril, Diego Maldonado, Felipe Maldonado, Maya Mallaby-Kay, Gabriela A Marques, Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Fiona McCarthy, Jeff McMahon, Yogesh Mehta, Felipe Menanteau, Kavilan Moodley, Thomas W Morris, Tony Mroczkowski, Toshiya Namikawa, Federico Nati, Simran K Nerval, Laura Newburgh, Andrina Nicola, Michael D Niemack, Michael R Nolta, John Orlowski-Scherer, Lyman A Page, Shivam Pandey, Bruce Partridge, Karen Perez Sarmiento, Heather Prince, Roberto Puddu, Frank J Qu, Damien C Ragavan, Bernardita Ried Guachalla, Keir K Rogers, Felipe Rojas, Tai Sakuma, Emmanuel Schaan, Benjamin L Schmitt, Neelima Sehgal, Shabbir Shaikh, Blake D Sherwin, Carlos Sierra, Jon Sievers, Cristóbal Sifón, Sara Simon, Rita Sonka, Alexander Spencer London, David N Spergel, Suzanne T Staggs, Emilie Storer, Kristen Surrao, Eric R Switzer, Niklas Tampier, Robert Thornton, Hy Trac, Carole Tucker, Joel Ullom, Leila R Vale, Alexander Van Engelen, Jeff Van Lanen, Cristian Vargas, Eve M Vavagiakis, Kasey Wagoner, Lukas Wenzl, Edward J Wollack, Kaiwen Zheng, The Atacama Cosmology Telescope collaboration

Abstract:

We present Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) Data Release 6 (DR6) maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature and polarization anisotropy at arcminute resolution over three frequency bands centered on 98, 150 and 220 GHz. The maps are based on data collected with the AdvancedACT camera over the period 2017–2022 and cover 19,000 square degrees with a median combined depth of 10 μK arcmin. We describe the instrument, mapmaking and map properties and illustrate them with a number of figures and tables. The ACT DR6 maps and derived products are available on LAMBDA at https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/act/actadv_prod_table.html. We also provide an interactive web atlas at https://phy-act1.princeton.edu/public/snaess/actpol/dr6/atlas and HiPS data sets in Aladin (e.g. https://alasky.cds.unistra.fr/ACT/DR4DR6/color_CMB).