Evidence for non-merger co-evolution of galaxies and their supermassive black holes

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Oxford University Press (OUP) 527:4 (2023) 10855-10866

Authors:

RJ Smethurst, RS Beckmann, BD Simmons, A Coil, J Devriendt, Y Dubois, IL Garland, CJ Lintott, G Martin, S Peirani

Glueball dark matter

Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS) 108:12 (2023) 123027

Authors:

Pierluca Carenza, Tassia Ferreira, Roman Pasechnik, Zhi-Wei Wang

Relativistic drag forces on black holes from scalar dark matter clouds of all sizes

Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS) 108:12 (2023) l121502

Authors:

Dina Traykova, Rodrigo Vicente, Katy Clough, Thomas Helfer, Emanuele Berti, Pedro G Ferreira, Lam Hui

Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra

Physical Review D American Physical Society 108:12 (2023) 123519

Authors:

Roohi Dalal, Xiangchong Li, Andrina Nicola, Joe Zuntz, Michael A Strauss, Sunao Sugiyama, Tianqing Zhang, Markus M Rau, Rachel Mandelbaum, Masahiro Takada, Surhud More, Hironao Miyatake, Arun Kannawadi, Masato Shirasaki, Takanori Taniguchi, Ryuichi Takahashi, Ken Osato, Takashi Hamana, Masamune Oguri, Atsushi J Nishizawa, Andrés A Plazas Malagón, Tomomi Sunayama, David Alonso, Anže Slosar, Wentao Luo

Abstract:

We measure weak lensing cosmic shear power spectra from the 3-year galaxy shear catalog of the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program imaging survey. The shear catalog covers 416  deg2 of the northern sky, with a mean i-band seeing of 0.59 arcsec and an effective galaxy number density of 15  arcmin−2 within our adopted redshift range. With an i-band magnitude limit of 24.5 mag, and four tomographic redshift bins spanning 0.3≤zph≤1.5 based on photometric redshifts, we obtain a high-significance measurement of the cosmic shear power spectra, with a signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 26.4 in the multipole range 300<ℓ<1800. The accuracy of our power spectrum measurement is tested against realistic mock shear catalogs, and we use these catalogs to get a reliable measurement of the covariance of the power spectrum measurements. We use a robust blinding procedure to avoid confirmation bias, and model various uncertainties and sources of bias in our analysis, including point spread function systematics, redshift distribution uncertainties, the intrinsic alignment of galaxies and the modeling of the matter power spectrum. For a flat ΛCDM model, we find S8≡σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.776+0.032−0.033, which is in excellent agreement with the constraints from the other HSC Year 3 cosmology analyses, as well as those from a number of other cosmic shear experiments. This result implies a ∼2σ-level tension with the Planck 2018 cosmology. We study the effect that various systematic errors and modeling choices could have on this value, and find that they can shift the best-fit value of S8 by no more than ∼0.5σ, indicating that our result is robust to such systematics.

The Galactic Interstellar Object Population: A Framework for Prediction and Inference

The Astronomical Journal American Astronomical Society 166:6 (2023) 241

Authors:

Matthew J Hopkins, Chris Lintott, Michele T Bannister, J Ted Mackereth, John C Forbes