Tracing North Atlantic Oscillation Forecast Errors to Stratospheric Origins

Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society 33:21 (2020) 9145-9157

Authors:

Erik W Kolstad, C Ole Wulff, Daniela IV Domeisen, Tim Woollings

Prediction of the quasi‐biennial oscillation with a multi‐model ensemble of QBO‐resolving models

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Wiley 148:744A (2020) 1519-1540

Authors:

Timothy N Stockdale, Young‐Ha Kim, James A Anstey, Froila M Palmeiro, Neal Butchart, Adam A Scaife, Martin Andrews, Andrew C Bushell, Mikhail Dobrynin, Javier Garcia‐Serrano, Kevin Hamilton, Yoshio Kawatani, Francois Lott, Charles McLandress, Hiroaki Naoe, Scott Osprey, Holger Pohlmann, John Scinocca, Shingo Watanabe, Kohei Yoshida, Seiji Yukimoto

Abstract:

A multi‐model study is carried out to investigate the ability of models to predict the evolution of the quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) up to 12 months in advance. All models are initialised from common reanalysis data, and forecasts run for a common set of 30 start dates over 15 years. All models have high skill in predicting the phase evolution of the QBO at 20–30 hPa, with slightly more variable results at higher and lower levels. Other aspects of the predicted QBO are of variable quality, and in some cases are consistently poor. QBO easterlies are too weak in all models at 20–50 hPa, while westerlies can be either too strong or too weak. This results in both a reduced amplitude of the QBO and a westerly bias in zonal‐mean winds, notably at 30 hPa. At 70 hPa models tend to have reduced QBO amplitude and an easterly bias. Despite these failings, a multi‐model ensemble of bias‐ and variance‐corrected forecasts can be used to give accurate and reliable QBO forecasts up to at least a year ahead. Analysis of the zonal momentum budget during the first month of the forecast shows that large‐scale forcing from Eliassen–Palm flux divergence and vertical advection are handled fairly well by the models, although vertical advection terms tend to be weaker than reanalysis estimates. Total tendencies show common errors, suggesting common failings in gravity‐wave drag treatments. Teleconnections from the QBO to Northern Hemisphere winter circulation are also examined, and do not appear to be realistic beyond the first month. Analysis of initialised forecasts is a powerful tool for diagnosing the accuracy of model processes driving the QBO.

The Phase-curve Signature of Condensible Water-rich Atmospheres on Slowly Rotating Tidally Locked Exoplanets

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS 901:2 (2020) ARTN L33

Authors:

Feng Ding, Raymond T Pierrehumbert

Tropospheric forcing of the 2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming

Geophysical Research Letters American Geophysical Union 47:20 (2020) e2020GL089343

Authors:

Xiaocen Shen, Lin Wang, Scott Osprey

Abstract:

The strongest and most persistent upward propagation of zonal wavenumber 1 (WN1) Rossby waves from the troposphere on record led to the rare Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in September 2019. The dynamical contribution from instantaneous anomalous WN1 and its linear interference with the climatological WN1 contributed equally to the event. The unprecedented WN1 planetary wave behavior is further attributed to a long‐lived midlatitude circumpolar Rossby wave train in the troposphere that was sustained by anomalous convection, first over the subtropical Pacific Ocean east of Australia and then over the eastern South Pacific. Besides the tropospheric wave forcing, the phase of the quasi‐biennial oscillation in the upper stratosphere also facilitated the weakening of polar vortex. Moreover, this SSW strongly influenced the tropospheric circulation via the Southern annular mode, favoring conditions linked to the 2019 bushfires in eastern Australia.

Forecasting extreme stratospheric polar vortex events

Nature Communications Springer Nature 11:1 (2020) 4630

Authors:

LJ Gray, Mj Brown, J Knight, M Andrews, H Lu, C O'Reilly, J Anstey

Abstract:

Extreme polar vortex events known as sudden stratospheric warmings can influence surface winter weather conditions, but their timing is difficult to predict. Here, we examine factors that influence their occurrence, with a focus on their timing and vertical extent. We consider the roles of the troposphere and equatorial stratosphere separately, using a split vortex event in January 2009 as the primary case study. This event cannot be reproduced by constraining wind and temperatures in the troposphere alone, even when the equatorial lower stratosphere is in the correct phase of the quasi biennial oscillation. When the flow in the equatorial upper stratosphere is also constrained, the timing and spatial evolution of the vortex event is captured remarkably well. This highlights an influence from this region previously unrecognised by the seasonal forecast community. We suggest that better representation of the flow in this region is likely to improve predictability of extreme polar vortex events and hence their associated impacts at the surface.