Euclid preparation

Astronomy & Astrophysics EDP Sciences 698 (2025) ARTN A233

Authors:

K Koyama, S Pamuk, S Casas, B Bose, P Carrilho, I Sáez-Casares, L Atayde, M Cataneo, B Fiorini, C Giocoli, Amc Le Brun, F Pace, A Pourtsidou, Y Rasera, Z Sakr, H-A Winther, E Altamura, J Adamek, M Baldi, M-A Breton, G Rácz, F Vernizzi, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, C Baccigalupi, S Bardelli, F Bernardeau, A Biviano, C Bodendorf, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, A Caillat, S Camera, G Cañas-Herrera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, J Carretero, M Castellano, G Castignani, S Cavuoti, Kc Chambers, A Cimatti, C Colodro-Conde, G Congedo, Cj Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin

Abstract:

We study the constraint on f(R) gravity that can be obtained by photometric primary probes of the Euclid mission. Our focus is the dependence of the constraint on the theoretical modelling of the nonlinear matter power spectrum. In the Hu–Sawicki f(R) gravity model, we consider four different predictions for the ratio between the power spectrum in f(R) and that in Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM): a fitting formula, the halo model reaction approach, ReACT, and two emulators based on dark matter only N-body simulations, FORGE and e-Mantis. These predictions are added to the MontePython implementation to predict the angular power spectra for weak lensing (WL), photometric galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. By running Markov chain Monte Carlo, we compare constraints on parameters and investigate the bias of the recovered f(R) parameter if the data are created by a different model. For the pessimistic setting of WL, one-dimensional bias for the f(R) parameter, log<inf>10</inf>| f<inf>R</inf><inf>0</inf>|, is found to be 0.5σ when FORGE is used to create the synthetic data with log<inf>10</inf>| f<inf>R</inf><inf>0</inf>| = −5.301 and fitted by e-Mantis. The impact of baryonic physics on WL is studied by using a baryonification emulator, BCemu. For the optimistic setting, the f(R) parameter and two main baryonic parameters are well constrained despite the degeneracies among these parameters. However, the difference in the nonlinear dark matter prediction can be compensated for the adjustment of baryonic parameters, and the one-dimensional marginalised constraint on log<inf>10</inf>| f<inf>R</inf><inf>0</inf>| is biased. This bias can be avoided in the pessimistic setting at the expense of weaker constraints. For the pessimistic setting, using the ΛCDM synthetic data for WL, we obtain the prior-independent upper limit of log<inf>10</inf>| f<inf>R</inf><inf>0</inf>| < −5.6. Finally, we implement a method to include theoretical errors to avoid the bias due to inaccuracies in the nonlinear matter power spectrum prediction.

Redshift tomography of the kinematic matter dipole

Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS) 111:12 (2025) 123547

Authors:

Sebastian von Hausegger, Charles Dalang

Abstract:

The dipole anisotropy induced by our peculiar motion in the sky distribution of cosmologically distant sources is an important consistency test of the standard Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker cosmology. In this work, we formalize how to compute the kinematic matter dipole in redshift bins. Apart from the usual terms arising from angular aberration and flux boosting, there is a contribution from the boosting of the redshifts that becomes important when considering a sample selected on observed redshift, leading to nonvanishing correction terms. We discuss examples and provide expressions to incorporate arbitrary redshift selection functions. We also discuss the effect of redshift measurement uncertainties in this context, in particular in upcoming surveys for which we provide estimates of the correction terms. Depending on the shape of a sample’s redshift distribution and on the applied redshift cuts, the correction terms can become substantial, even to the degree that the direction of the dipole is reversed. Lastly, we discuss how cuts on variables correlated with observed redshift, such as color, can induce additional correction terms. Published by the American Physical Society 2025

Calibrating baryonic effects in cosmic shear with external data in the LSST era

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2025)

Authors:

Amy Wayland, David Alonso, and Matteo Zennaro

Abstract:

Cosmological constraints derived from weak lensing (WL) surveys are limited by baryonic effects, which suppress the non-linear matter power spectrum on small scales. By combining WL measurements with data from external tracers of the gas around massive structures, it is possible to calibrate baryonic effects and, therefore, obtain more precise cosmological constraints. In this study, we generate mock data for a Stage-IV weak lensing survey such as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), X-ray gas fractions, and stacked kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) measurements, to jointly constrain cosmological and astrophysical parameters describing baryonic effects (using the Baryon Correction Model - BCM). First, using WL data alone, we quantify the level to which the BCM parameters will need to be constrained to recover the cosmological constraints obtained under the assumption of perfect knowledge of baryonic feedback. We identify the most relevant baryonic parameters and determine that they must be calibrated to a precision of ∼10-20% to avoid significant degradation of the fiducial WL constraints. We forecast that long-term X-ray data from ∼5000 clusters should be able to reach this threshold for the parameters that characterise the abundance of hot virialised gas. Constraining the distribution of ejected gas presents a greater challenge, however, but we forecast that long-term kSZ data from a CMB-S4-like experiment should achieve the level of precision required for full self-calibration.

syren-baryon: Analytic emulators for the impact of baryons on the matter power spectrum

(2025)

Authors:

Lukas Kammerer, Deaglan J Bartlett, Gabriel Kronberger, Harry Desmond, Pedro G Ferreira

Euclid: Early Release Observations The intracluster light of Abell 2390

Astronomy and Astrophysics 698 (2025)

Authors:

A Ellien, M Montes, SL Ahad, P Dimauro, JB Golden-Marx, Y Jimenez-Teja, F Durret, C Bellhouse, JM Diego, SP Bamford, AH Gonzalez, NA Hatch, M Kluge, R Ragusa, E Slezak, JC Cuillandre, R Gavazzi, H Dole, G Mahler, G Congedo, T Saifollahi, N Aghanim, B Altieri, A Amara, S Andreon, N Auricchio, C Baccigalupi, M Baldi, A Balestra, S Bardelli, A Basset, P Battaglia, A Biviano, A Bonchi, D Bonino, E Branchini, M Brescia, J Brinchmann, A Caillat, S Camera, V Capobianco, C Carbone, VF Cardone, J Carretero, S Casas, M Castellano, G Castignani, S Cavuoti, A Cimatti, C Colodro-Conde, CJ Conselice, L Conversi, Y Copin, F Courbin, HM Courtois, M Cropper, AD Silva, H Degaudenzi, G De Lucia, AMD Giorgio, J Dinis, F Dubath, CAJ Duncan, X Dupac, S Dusini, M Farina, F Faustini, S Ferriol, S Fotopoulou, M Frailis, E Franceschi, S Galeotta, K George, B Gillis, C Giocoli, P Gómez-Alvarez, A Grazian, F Grupp, L Guzzo, SVH Haugan, J Hoar, H Hoekstra, W Holmes, F Hormuth, A Hornstrup, P Hudelot, K Jahnke, M Jhabvala, B Joachimi, E Keihänen, S Kermiche, A Kiessling, B Kubik, K Kuijken, M Kümmel, M Kunz, H Kurki-Suonio, R Laureijs, D Le Mignant, S Ligori

Abstract:

Intracluster light (ICL) provides a record of the dynamical interactions undergone by clusters, giving clues on cluster formation and evolution. Here, we analyse the properties of ICL in the massive cluster Abell 2390 at redshift z = 0.228. Our analysis is based on the deep images obtained by the Euclid mission as part of the Early Release Observations in the near-infrared (YE, JE, HE bands), using the NISP instrument in a 0.75 deg2 field. We subtracted a point–spread function (PSF) model and removed the Galactic cirrus contribution in each band after modelling it with the DAWIS software. We then applied three methods to detect, characterise, and model the ICL and the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG): the CICLE 2D multi-galaxy fitting; the DAWIS wavelet-based multiscale software; and a mask-based 1D profile fitting. We detect ICL out to 600 kpc. The ICL fractions derived by our three methods range between 18% and 36% (average of 24%), while the BCG+ICL fractions are between 21% and 41% (average of 29%), depending on the band and method. A galaxy density map based on 219 selected cluster members shows a strong cluster substructure to the south-east and a smaller feature to the north-west. Ellipticals dominate the cluster’s central region, with a centroid offset from the BCG by about 70 kpc and distribution following that of the ICL, while spirals do not trace the entire ICL but rather substructures. The comparison of the BCG+ICL, mass from gravitational lensing, and X-ray maps show that the BCG+ICL is the best tracer of substructures in the cluster. Based on colours, the ICL (out to about 400 kpc) seems to be built by the accretion of small systems (M ∼ 109.5 M ), or from stars coming from the outskirts of Milky Way-type galaxies (M ∼ 1010 M ). Though Abell 2390 does not seem to be undergoing a merger, it is not yet fully relaxed, since it has accreted two groups that have not fully merged with the cluster core. We estimate that the contributions to the inner 300 kpc of the ICL of the north-west and south-east subgroups are 21% and 9%, respectively.