Vertical Distribution of Cloud and Ammonia in Jupiter’s equatorial atmosphere revealed by co-analysis of VLT/MUSE, Cassini/VIMS and Juno/JIRAM  

(2026)

Authors:

Patrick Irwin, Asier Anguiano-Arteaga, Michelle Colantoni, Joseph Penn, Santiago Perez-Hoyos, Davide Grassi, Charlotte Alexander

Abstract:

Analysing observations of Jupiter made by VLT/MUSE (0.475 – 0.933 μm), Cassini/VIMS (0.40 – 5.15 μm), and Juno/JIRAM (2 – 5 μm), we present early results of a new combined cloud-ammonia profile model for Jupiter's equatorial atmosphere. We find this model to be consistent with all observations considered, at a range of observation geometries, within the Equatorial Zone (EZ), the North Equatorial Belt (NEB) and a North Equatorial Dark Feature (NEDF), also known as a '5-micron-hotspot'. Preliminary results suggest the presence of three main layers: 1) a deep 'Cloud-1' at 1-2 bar; 2) an upper 'Cloud-2' in the upper troposphere based at ~0.55 bar; and 3) a layer of chromophore particles situated within the Cloud-1 layer, responsible for the blue-absorption at visible wavelengths.  Our best-fit ammonia profile is closely linked with our cloud profile, with Cloud-1 coinciding with a sharp drop in ammonia abundance, perhaps associated with the formation of a H2O-NH3 'mushball' cloud, or an ammonium hydrosulphide (NH4SH) cloud, or both, and Cloud-2 coinciding with the ammonia condensation level.We find the bulk of the cloud opacity in Jupiter’s atmosphere to be in the Cloud-1 layer, based at 1-2 bar and composed of relatively large particles (r ~ 10 μm), which are highly scattering at visible wavelengths to allow sunlight to penetrate and be Rayleigh-scattered from the deeper atmosphere, but more absorbing at 5 μm. The belt/zone difference at 5 μm is accounted for by changes in the opacity of Cloud-1 and also the single-scattering albedo of these particles. We find the Cloud-2 layer, based at the ammonia condensation level, to be approximately 10 times less opaque than Cloud-1 and have an absorption band near 3 μm, which is consistent with this layer having a significant opacity of large (r ~ 10 μm) ammonia ice particles.We will present preliminary insights into the spatial distribution of these clouds over the regions considered and their implications for our understanding of Jupiter’s chromophores and upper-level hazes.

A Processing Workflow for Cassini VIMS Jupiter Cubes

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series American Astronomical Society 285:1 (2026) 30

Authors:

Asier Anguiano-Arteaga, Patrick GJ Irwin, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos, Davide Grassi, Emiliano D’Aversa

Abstract:

We present a calibrated catalog of Cassini Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) observations of Jupiter, together with the processing workflow used to generate the final publicly available products. Starting from the raw VIMS cubes, the workflow produces radiometrically consistent multiextension Flexible Image Transport System files and includes a revised visible-channel calibration, a revised infrared-channel calibration that resolves a subset of problematic cases not satisfactorily treated by the standard Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers pipeline, corrections for pointing-related misalignments between spectral cubes and geometric backplanes, and customized dark signal correction strategies. The final products include calibrated spectral cubes together with geometry backplanes and wavelength information for subsequent scientific analysis. We assess the consistency of the calibrated products through internal validation tests and comparisons with independent reference spectra from the literature. The resulting products provide a uniform and validated data set of Cassini VIMS Jupiter observations for community use. The full catalog is available as a public dataset at doi:10.5281/zenodo.19223781.

Flow-Driven Limb-Asymmetry of Haze Distribution Part I: An Analytical Framework for Predicting the Size Distribution of Photochemical Hazes Across the Two Limbs of hot-Jupiters

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 550, Issue 4 (2026)

Authors:

Mei Ting Mak, Thaddeus D. Komacek, Nathan J. Mayne, David K. Sing

Abstract:

Photochemical haze, a common aerosol type expected to form in the atmospheres of hot-Jupiters, can become concentrated to different extents between the morning and evening limbs depending on the balance between advection, gravitational settling, and radiation pressure. We present a analytical framework incorporating the effect of gravity, planetary radius, and stellar flux, alongside the particle size of the haze on its resulting relative distribution between the two limbs. Using this framework and further comparing with 3D climate simulations, our framework provides a reasonable first-order estimate of the maximum radius of haze particles which would reach the morning limb and subsequently be trapped by the nightside gyres, resulting in a higher or comparable concentration of haze over the morning limb compared to the evening limb for a given hot-Jupiter atmosphere. We find that the framework performs best for higher-gravity planets, where the transport of haze particles is more strongly controlled by gravitational settling and therefore less sensitive to the approximations made in describing the atmospheric circulation. We further show that for low-gravity hot-Jupiters, even large haze particles can be readily transported to the morning limb before being removed by gravitational settling, whereas for high-gravity hot-Jupiters only small particles can survive transport to the morning limb. Our novel framework provides a rapid way to understand the transport of haze and plan limb asymmetry observations with JWST, constraining the parameter space exploration for full-scale computationally expensive 3D simulations.

Direct Imaging Discovery of Giant Exoplanet $β$ Pictoris d: A Decade-Long Game of Hide-and-Seek

(2026)

Authors:

Ben J Sutlieff, Markus J Bonse, Valentin Christiaens, Clémence Fontanive, Elisabeth C Matthews, Luke T Parker, Tim D Pearce, Jayne L Birkby, Beth A Biller, Trent J Dupuy, Emily O Garvin, Leyla Iskandarli, Jens Kammerer, Yifan Zhou, Robert J De Rosa, Aarynn L Carter, Sasha Hinkley, Matthew A Kenworthy, William O Balmer, Iain Hammond, James Mang, Caroline V Morley, Mark J Neeser, Olivier Absil, Anthony Boccaletti, Mariangela Bonavita, Brendan P Bowler, Xueqing Chen, Felix A Dannert, Julien H Girard, Markus Kasper, Anne-Marie Lagrange, Pengyu Liu, Gilles Orban de Xivry, Michael Poon, Sascha P Quanz, Benoît Serra, Johanna M Vos, Kevin Wagner, Jason Wang, Bernhard Schölkopf, Guido Agapito, Alex Agudo Berbel, Dániel Apai, Andrea Baruffolo, Martin Black, Marco Bonaglia, Runa Briguglio, Yixian Cao, Luca Carbonaro, Lee Chapman, Giovanni Cresci, Yigit Dallilar, Richard Davies, Matthias Deysenroth, Ivan Di Antonio, Amico Di Cianno, Gianluca Di Rico, David Doelman, Mauro Dolci, Frank Eisenhauer, Simone Esposito, Debora Ferruzzi, Helmut Feuchtgruber, Natascha Förster-Schreiber, Kyle Franson, Reinhard Genzel, Stefan Gillessen, Eileen C Gonzales, Michael Hartl, Jean Hayoz, Heinrich Huber, Christoph Keller, Kateryna Kravchenko, Jarron Leisenring, John Lightfoot, David Lunney, Dieter Lutz, Mike Macintosh, Filippo Mannucci, Stanimir Metchev, Thomas Ott, David Pearson, Alfio Puglisi, Sebastian Rabien, Christian Rau, Armando Riccardi, Bernardo Salasnich, Taro Shimizu, Frans Snik, Eckhard Sturm, Genaro Suárez, Linda Tacconi, Xianyu Tan, William Taylor, Christopher Waring, Marco Xompero

Magnetic field strengths of hot giant exoplanets consistent with Solar System values

(2026)

Authors:

Julia V Seidel, Vivien Parmentier, Bibiana Prinoth, Thea Hood, Nishil Mehta, Valentin De Lia, Konstantin Batygin, Tristan Guillot, Ragnar Van den Broeck, Hayley Beltz, Brian Thorsbro, Florian Debras, Daniel DB Koll, Thaddeus D Komacek, Emily Rauscher, Lorenzo Pino, Matteo Brogi, Joost P Wardenier, Jacob L Bean, Björn Benneke, Jean-Michel LB Désert, Pablo Drake, Siddharth Gandhi, Mark Hammond, David Kasper, Michael R Line, Elspeth KH Lee, Stefan Pelletier, Andreas Seifahrt, Adrien Simonnin, Peter CB Smith, Kevin B Stevenson